16:00Newbury· GB · 2026-06-01
Pump Technology Jonathan And Natalie Handicap
· Good To Firm· Flat· Turf
Result
| Pos | Draw | Horse | Jockey / Trainer | SP | Best | Btn | OR | RPR | TS | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | Aces Wild (IRE) 7yo | Finley Marsh | 11/4 3.750 | — | won | 74 | – | — | Held up in rear - ridden and headway over 1f out - ran on inside final furlong - led final strides(op 3/1 tchd 10/3) |
| 2 | 1 | Merrimack (GB) 5yo | Chloe Lyons | 8/1 9.000 | — | 0.30L | 69 | – | — | Took keen hold - prominent - led after 2f - faced challenges inside final furlong - headed final strides(op 15/2 tchd 7/1) |
| 3 | 5 | Spring Bloom (GB) 9yo | Jack Callan | 6/4F 2.500 | — | 1.00L | 70 | – | — | Prominent - challenging inside final furlong - lost second towards finish(op 13/8 tchd 11/8) |
| 4 | 4 | Harry Brown (GB) 6yo | Rob Hornby | 12/1 13.000 | — | 0.30L | 56 | – | — | Pressed leaders - kept on inside final furlong |
| 5 | 8 | Hint Of Humour (GB) 4yo | Clifford Lee | 13/2 7.500 | — | 1.50L | 70 | – | — | Slowly into stride - in touch with leaders - outpaced from 2f out(op 17/2) |
| 6 | 6 | The Feminine Urge (IRE) 4yo | Ashley Lewis | 28/1 29.000 | — | 0.50L | 62 | – | — | In rear throughout(op 16/1) |
| 7 | 7 | Faustus (GB) 8yo | Ryan Kavanagh | 15/2 8.500 | — | 1.25L | 60 | – | — | Soon led - headed and prominent after 2f - lost position over 1f out - dropped to last final 110yds(op 13/2 tchd 6/1) |
| — | 3 | Unico 5yo M · 122lb | NON-RUNNER | — | — | — | 57 | 81 | 78 | — |
Winning time: 1m 0.57s (slow by 0.97s)
Pre-race AI predictions · what we said before the race ran
| Jockey / Trainer | Form | ELO_T | ELO_J | # | Stars | Tier | BF | Slip | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 dr.2 |  | 7yo | — trip … | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||
2 dr.5 |  | 9yo | — trip … | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||
3 dr.8 |  | 4yo | — trip … | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||
4 dr.1 |  | 5yo · tv | — trip … | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||
5 dr.6 |  | 4yo · p | — trip … | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||
6 dr.7 |  | 8yo | — trip … | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||
8 dr.4 |  | 6yo | — trip … | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||
NR dr.3 |  | NR 5yo M · 122lb | 1438-8 26d trip … | 122 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Click any runner row for the original spotlight, framework breakdown and pedigree. Use this to compare what the model predicted vs how the race actually played out.
Loading AI analysis…
Rating from HRV Framework v4.1: 10 deterministic dimension scores combined into a field-relative rating where the top horse in each race scores 100. Tiers PRIMARY / SECONDARY / OUTSIDER / NO CHANCE band off that rating. See methodology. 18+. BeGambleAware.